Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Anton's avatar

What a sobering and vital read, Maxwell. The Trump–Vance move to “sanitize” the Smithsonian feels like the latest installment in a global campaign to neuter institutions that dare challenge dominant narratives. Framing truth-telling as “divisive” is how authoritarianism launders itself through culture. And the chilling part? This strategy isn't novel—it echoes Hungary, Poland, even Italy in recent years.

But what gives me hope is exactly what you highlighted: the plurality of voices in the arts, from critics to curators to visitors. It's also a reminder that museums aren’t just spaces of preservation—they’re battlegrounds for meaning. The idea that “objective facts” must be protected from ideological contamination is itself an ideological stance.

We need institutions brave enough to keep telling complex, uncomfortable stories—especially those that challenge mythologies of “shared” history. Because history isn’t shared until it’s fully told.

Curious to hear others’ thoughts: How should museums respond to political pressure like this while maintaining their integrity and public funding?

Expand full comment

No posts